Search This Blog

Tuesday, November 02, 2010

The Propitiation for Sin


In an ongoing effort to challenge readers of my blog to rethink the whole question of whether or not the cross was a place where the Father of Jesus punished the Son by pouring out anger on Him, I want to bring forward a verse that may suggest something very different from what many have been taught and believed thus far. As regular readers of my blog and listeners to my teachings know, I do not hold the penal substitution view of the work of the cross. In other words, I don't believe that the Father was in any way pouring out anger on Jesus while He was on the cross. To the contrary, the work of the cross was a unified expression of love by our Triune God. The Father was "in Christ" while Jesus was on the cross (see 2 Cor 5:19) and this rescue mission for humanity was accomplished as Jesus offered Himself "through the eternal Spirit." (see Hebrews 9:14) So the whole Godhead was at work in securing our salvation from the death sin brings.

In Romans 3:25, Jesus is referred to as the One,"whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith." The word "propitiation"is a key word in understanding the meaning of the atonement. It is a word that has often been used to indicate an appeasement for sin, in a punitive sense. The English word comes from the Greek hilasterion and is defined as, "relating to an appeasing or expiating, having placating or expiating force, expiatory; a means of appeasing or expiating." Here's the link to the Greek Lexicon online so that you can see the word for yourself: http://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/greek/nas/hilasterion.html

At first pause, the word can certainly suggest the sort of act that makes Jesus the recipient of retribution from His Father, especially if our minds are already hardwired to see God the Father as somebody who just had to vent all that anger we have wrongly imagined Him to hold toward us because of our sin.

I suggest, however, that there is another way to see the word "propitiation." Note in the Greek Lexicon that the definition is further expressed as, "a propitiation used of the cover of the ark of the covenant in the Holy of Holies, which was sprinkled with the blood of the expiatory victim on the annual day of atonement."

Here's where we can interpret the Bible in a way that is consistent with "God is love" as our point of origin in discovering its meaning. Note that this aspect of its meaning refers to the mercy seat that covered the Ark of the Covenant. It was on that mercy seat that the blood of the sacrificial animals was poured out and the efficacy of that blood poured out at that place brought the remission of sins for another year.

So the word "propitiation" is used not only to refer to an expiation in a judicial sense but also to refer to a place - the place where sin was dealt with by the blood of a sacrifice. The Septuagint is a translation in which the Old Testament Scriptures (written in Hebrew) were translated into Greek. When the translators came to the Hebrew word kaporeth (mercy seat), they chose to use the Greek word, hilasterion (propitiation)as the equivalent. So they obviously held the view that propitiation had more to do with the remedial aspect of the sacrifice for sin than it did for any sort of retribution exploding out of an angry Father upon His Son. The propitiation was the place where sin was dealt with. In other words, the cross was the New Covenant substance foreshadowed through the Old Covenant shadow of the mercy seat.

The cross was no more a place where God poured out anger on Jesus that the Mercy Seat was a place where an Old Testament high priest poured out anger on a lamb. Propitiation was remedial, not retributive! The cross was the place of Divine Agape not divine anger! The only anger there that day was the anger of sinful humanity unleashed on Pure Love.

Another interesting aspect of the word hilasterion (propitiation) is that it shares the same family history as the word hilaros. (Think "hilarious"). It refers to a place of Divine Joy, not rage.

The cross of Jesus Christ is the most pure expression of love that has ever or will ever exist. In that place of propitiation, Pure Agape submitted Himself to the ferocity of sinful humanity while at the same time absorbing our sin into Himself so that we would be delivered from its consequence.

Your God isn't angry with you. He never has been. The cross proves that. Religion has smeared His face with mud from the Garden of Guilt after the fall of man, but that false image doesn't negate the reality of who He is at all. "God is Love." Always has been. Always will be.

15 comments:

  1. How fitting the theme is to our walk in Jesus Christ and your expounded 'hilasterion' brilliant!
    It fit of course it do with Hebrews 12:1ff.; joy, hilarity at the place God propitiates! Your use of remedial as over and against retributive, excellent thoughts, line of reasoning impeccable Steve! If we could shout the good news from the rooftops we'd have an Agape love song from God proclaimed that well! Zephaniah 3:17. Your blog is leading my healed heart to adore our Lord in a new afresh season.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Perfect! It's a place of love. Oh, HIS amazing extravagant, lavish agape love! To God be the glory!

    Sheryl

    ReplyDelete
  3. Steve , I am loving these postings. However their still is one more but. Following your line of thoughts I am getting the sense that God the father being not angry at sin then why is there a eternal punishment for those that reject the sacrifice which is really the ultimate sin?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great question, Johnny. It isn't God who punishes us for sin. It is sin itself that brings punishment. Another word for the Greek word translated as punishment is "penalty." Sin brings its own penalty. It's like eating all our meals at McDonalds every day. The punishment for that kind of lifestyle will be poor health. It's not God, McDonalds or anybody else who is punishing us with poor health, but is the result of what eating that way does. In the same way, sin brings its own punishment (as well as condemnation) to us. We can't pin that on God. To the contrary, in Christ He has come to deliver us from it. People who suffer hell (both now and later) are those who refuse His cure. It's not God punishing them. It's the sin they won't let go of for anything, including Him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great stuff Steve, Ok, I get it we cause the penalty but those that do not accept the cure for sin will face the great white throne. Those that do not accept the cure for sin cannot place themselves at that throne. At some point the Father is the one carrying out the judgement right? So the question remains what is the reason that the Father Judges? Could it not be because of his anger toward sin? Whats worse than being eternally separated from the one who is able to do all things? That seems to be very severe of a judgement on God's behalf. There has to be a reason for the severity of the punishment. Do you contend that it is Agape that is Pushing that severity? One other Question, Don't the Bible teach that Adam is the reason we fall short of the glory of GOD? I know we commit sin because we are under Adam's curse but we also come by honestly right? Don't want to be a pest on here just some thoughts I had as I was contemplating your post. Grace to you!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Steve, loving this series but I have a question. You said God has never been angry with us - how do you interpret the many Scriptures that say things like "God is angry at the wicked all day long" and "Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them"

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Recovering Alum - it important to look at each verse you have in mind and as you do, you'll discover that they don't teach what they may seem to at first glance.

    For instance, take the one you mentioned - Psalm 7:11 where some versions say that God is angry at the wicked all day long. Not all versions of the Bible are equally reliable. That's why it's a good idea to compare versions. For instance, the NASV translates that verse this way: "God is a righteous Judge; and a God who has indignation every day." God angry with us? That would certainly be hard to reconcile with Ecclesiastes 7:9 which says that anger resides in the bosom of fools.

    Want to see why we must compare translations? You asked about Psalm 7:11 as a verse that evidences God is angry. Look at Young's Literal Translation of that verse here at this link: http://www.biblestudytools.com/ylt/psalms/7-11.html Amazingly, it actually shows that the verse says that God is NOT angry. Again, we must do a thorough study if we want to dig deep enough to understand some things.

    As to wrath - I invite you to watch the Sunday Preaching broadcast on my web site for the next few weeks. I'm going to do a whole teaching on wrath and will show you that the word "wrath" doesn't have to mean anger at all. It actually can refer to ANY intense excitement - including love. Of course, if our view is that our God is a Judge who is obsessed with right & wrong in our lives, we will automatically think His wrath is an expression of anger. But it's not. His wrath is "tough love." Watch the upcoming teaching and you'll see what I mean.

    But for now you can look at this definition of "wrath" in the Greek Lexicon: http://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/greek/nas/orge.html Take a look at the second definition and you'll see that wrath can be "any violent emotion. I'll say more about that in the Sunday Preaching broadcast, so be sure to watch.

    Good questions, Recovering Alum. Thanks for your input.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Holy Crap, Steve. The rabbit hole just keeps going further and further! lol

    I'll definitely check out the sermons. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous8:07 AM

    LOVED that Steve! Beautifully explained!

    Life or Death - Love or Anger - Grace or Law - it seems there are always two ways that oppose each other in the interpretation and we are given the choice. Same story, two authors - One introduces a loving Father God, the other, a mean Father 'type' God..... wow - Lovin this new way of seeing things!

    Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  10. steve,

    some Christian people who have been greatly wronged find comfort in the idea that God was angry about what was done to them and also angry at the perpetrators who did it... these also find comfort in the idea that God took vengeance for His beloved- punishing sin, and specifically this great wrong done to them, at the cross in Jesus. some even find this idea so comforting that they leave vengeance alone, accepting what God did at the cross as the vengeance.

    but what you are saying blows these beliefs up. so, what does "VENGEANCE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY" mean?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Lance - the fact that some people project their own anger onto God and imagine that He is angry with those who hurt them and will "pay them back for hurting me" can't possibly fit with grace. If it makes people to feel better to think, "God will get 'em one day!" it seems to me that the person may need to hear from the Holy Spirit about the matter of forgiveness. That certainly seems "more Christian" than looking forward to the day the offending party gets their comeuppance.

    What does "Vengeance is mine, I will repay" mean? Good question. Here's the link that leads the the meaning of the word "vengeance" - http://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/greek/nas/ekdikesis.html

    As you see, the word can have to do with anger and payback. And that is most certainly the definition we will flee to if we see God as a judicial judge who is ready to dole out punishment on those who've done wrong. However, note that there are other ways of understanding the word too.

    The Lexicon also gives this definition: "meeting out of justice; doing justice to all parties." Notice that one doesn't have a thing to do with punishment, but simply with making things right. Vincent even suggests: "The word also has the sense of acquittal and carries the sense of vindication." So "vengeance" can be understood as making things right between everybody and acquitting the guilty party. That sounds a lot more like my Father's grace than payback :)

    So "Vengeance is mine; I will repay" then can mean, "I will bring justice to your bad situation and I will make everything right." Doesn't that sound more like the Father Jesus revealed?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Johnny - great questions. I'll answer them one by one in the order you asked them.

    1."At some point the Father is the one carrying out the judgment, right?" Yes, that's right but not in a punishing way. The word "judgment" is a word that can mean "to determine." I "judge" whether or not I have enough gas to reach my destination. So, yes, determination is made at that moment whether or not the person is trusting in Christ. If not, the person (by their own rejection of God) goes to hell. It isn't God rejecting him but him rejecting God.

    2.Whats worse than being eternally separated from the one who is able to do all things? There is no biblical reason to suggest that people in hell are separated from God. God is omnipresent. He is everywhere. I will soon record a session for the Sunday Preaching broadcast where I'll teach that hell is the inescapable presence of God's love, not His absence. To those who hate His love, that is hell to them. (James said that when we love our enemies, it's like heaping coals of fire on their heads.) Watch the Sun Preaching to hear my full explanation of this.

    3. Do you contend that it is Agape that is Pushing that severity? God's love is hell to those who hate it. That's why it's severe to them. Those of us who receive His love don't find it severe in a negative way. We find it thrilling.

    4. Doesn't the Bible teach that Adam is the reason we fall short of the glory of GOD? I know we commit sin because we are under Adam's curse but we also come by honestly right?

    No, we are not under Adam's curse. The Last Adam (Jesus) delivered us from that curse. The need is for everybody to stop believing the lie from Satan and to know the Truth (Jesus). When we know the Truth, He sets us free.

    Keep wrestling with it, Johnny :) Good questions.

    2.
    2.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I asked the question on another blog about your view of hell...I see it here and I remember it from before now. You think for those who hate God hell will be being in His presence. I have to agree, but I think one day that love will overwhelm them and they will not be able to fight it any longer. This was my experience. And Saul's I think. Holding this view gets me the label of 'universalist' by people, which is just about the worst thing you can be amongst many believers. Say you've turned atheist and they won't disdain you half as much.
    I did ask another question on that blog...about your view of salvation. I'd love to hear your view

    ReplyDelete
  14. Steve, I loved your teaching on Propitiation; it actually made me cry as it is yet another proof that God is not an angry God but actually IS Love. But, I am still struggling with the concept of eternal hell. If He created Hell(which is Sheol or grave in the Old Testament by the way), then no amount of exegesis blaming 'Sin' negates the self-evident truth that He allows an eternal torture of those He loves. A trillion to an exponent power without end ratio to one life time(some much shorter than others) of retribution -- that is obviously not remedial since it is without end. I struggle with such a doctrine that I think has driven more people away from an honest look at the Gospel than any other teaching.

    ReplyDelete