Search This Blog

Friday, November 11, 2011

Robert F. Capon On Grace

Here's an excerpt of an interview Tim Brassell, pastor of New Creation Community Church, in Portsmouth, Virginia, did with Christian author Robert Farrar Capon and published in Grace Communion International's magazine, "Christian Odyssey."

If you aren't familiar with Robert Capon or with Grace Communion International, you'd benefit from knowing both. Capon's books can be found on amazon.com and you can find GCI at www.gci.org


RC:"Nothing separates us from the love of God." We think there must be some breaking point where God would give up on us. "Well, what about if we…?"

Sin is not a problem with God. God solved all his problems with sin before the foundation of the world, in the beginning—and it’s done. The iceberg that lies under the surface of history is the Son of God; redemption is the mystery behind all history. Sin is a permanent irrelevancy. And God is the one to say, "Look, I have taken away the handwriting that was against you."

I like the translation in Matthew, "forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors." What do we do when we don’t forgive somebody else’s debts, or literally, their sins? We carp on what they owe us. We look at the chits that we have saved. This is what you owe me and you haven’t given it to me. There is an IOU I hold against you, and I gotta have this…. Well, it’s not that way with God. With God, it’s done—there is no handwriting against us. It’s done. He’s not holding IOUs.

TB: So why do we have such a love affair with legalism?

RC: It’s something that’s afflicted the church from the start. Humans have a hard time believing that God doesn’t hold IOUs. But Paul says the law cannot save. He says, "He has made him to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in him."

TB: Have you found an effective way to present the gospel to a legalist?

RC: No (laughter). The reason I say no is because all that you’re going to do is present it and shock them. If you try to do it in a winsome way, which I always do, and try to do it to show them the freedom of it, then you’ve got a chance. A small chance, not a big one, but you’ve got a chance—because, when it happens—people go, "Wow!"

I was made visiting professor of something or other in religion at the University of Tulsa for the fall term back in the ’80s or ’90s. I had two classes. One was a 39-week beginning course. I taught the parables, and I had, I would say, everybody against me. All these youngsters were against me because what I was saying was against everything they had ever heard. I pounded and pounded and pounded for 39 weeks. I went through every parable.

One young lady came up to me at the end and said: "You know, when I first came here I didn’t like anything you said, because it contradicted everything I knew. But, you have done something. For the first time in my life I see that it really is good news" (laughter). They thought the gospel was bad news! That’s what legalism does to people.

Tim Brassell: Can a pastor take grace too far?

Robert Capon: No. A pastor can’t take grace too far. That is, not unless he claims that sin doesn’t matter. If he claims that, he’s abusing grace, because sin does matter. It matters to me, the sinner. It matters whether I leave myself stuck in it.

Suppose a mother has a kid who comes in all muddy. She just washes off the mud. She loves her child and doesn’t wait to see whether the kid decides if he wants to live with mud all over him. She just washes it off. And if she is a faithful, true mother, she will continually take that mud into herself and say, "Well, this is my son, and I will stick with him."

TB: Mothers are like that.

RC: Yes. The point is that sin is mud. It’s a cover-up or cover-over of your true being as a person. And Jesus has washed it away. He’s erased the sins. He’s washed them away.

3 comments:

  1. Steve,

    Blake Rymer here.

    As you know I am a prominent member of that "organization that teaches the believers identity in Christ" which you recently alluded to in your blog. For what it's worth, the "couple of guys" with whom you take issue were asked by the board of directors of the organization to write a paper to help the members of same organization understand the specific differences between trinitarianism and the message we call the exchanged life. The document we released to our members was focused on trinitarianism and did not mention you nor Kruger because our intent was to educate our members so they might make their own evaluation of the theology of trinitarianism.

    While a different version of that document was posted by one of those "guys" without our knowledge, I am concerned that the way you are responding is not helping to resolve this family disagreement. You may have the gift of sarcasm but the origin of that gift is not likely the Holy Spirit and the exercise of that gift is not likely to promote unity and peace.

    When I had a question about what you are teaching I came to you and we talked about it, and I left persuaded that you do not believe nor teach universalism. Perhaps not all those who have the same questions have approached you like I did. But that does not excuse you from following the pattern that our Lord provided for maintaining the unity of the Spirit.

    It is my prayer that you would humbly take the initiative to speak with those "guys" and reaffirm your love for one another. It is my intent to ask the same of them. Please don't cast this as a personal issue when it is, in fact, a disagreement about theology.

    I press on...

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Blake, I'm moving your comment above down to the post it references. I think you accidentally posted it in the wrong place....

    ReplyDelete