Saturday, November 06, 2010

A Question About Verses That Seem To Say All Aren't Holy

For those of you who aren't on FaceBook, I'm posting a recent exchange I had there in response to yesterday's blog about the holiness of humanity. Terry raised a good question by citing a few verses that seem to contradict what I wrote yesterday. I'm posting here for those who don't use FB...

Terry wrote:

‎1 Tim. 1:9, "realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the UNHOLY..."

2 Tim. 3:2, "For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, UNHOLY..."

I responded:

Terry, and others who may wonder the same thing about verses that seem to suggest that we aren't holy - allow me to illustrate something:

Can we lose our salvation? (Of course we cannot, but look the following verses)

Matt 6:15 "But if you do not forgive others, then your Father will not forgive your transgressions.

1 Cor 15:1-2 Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, by which also you are saved, IF you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain.

Col 1:22-23 Yet He has now reconciled you in His fleshly body through death, in order to present you before Him holy and blameless and beyond reproach IF indeed you continue in the faith firmly...

Heb 3:6, 14 but Christ was faithful as a Son over His house -whose house we are, IF we hold fast our confidence and the boast of our hope firm until the end. For we have become partakers of Christ, IF we hold fast the beginning of our assurance firm until the end.

2 Pet 2:20-22 For if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world by the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and are overcome, the last state has become worse for them than the first. For it would be better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn away from the holy commandment handed on to them.

These verses, as well as others I could cite, seem to suggest that a person can lose his salvation IF he doesn't hold on until the end. But the fact is that there is a reasonable explanation for each of these verses, just as there is an explanation for any verse that seems to suggest that the finished work of Jesus on the cross doesn't apply to people until they believe it.

We must examine verses within the greater context of the New Testament and, in my opinion, when we do this we will discover that the benefits of the cross aren't doled out to people in a piecemeal style.

Jesus died for everybody. What are the benefits of the cross? Forgiveness, holiness, righteousness (not the same as holiness), life, etc.

Are people forgiven whether they know it or not? Of course they are. God is "not counting their trespasses against them," whether they know or believe it or not. Their problem is unbelief not their trespasses.

So forgiveness applies to them even before they believe? (Yes) Is holiness a benefit of the cross? (Yes) So the same work of Jesus that provided forgiveness to all provides holiness too? (Yes) And one doesn't have to believe he is forgiven for it to be true? (That's right)

Now, considering this "conversation" I had with myself, consider this question: Does it make sense that even one aspect of the cross applies to people before they believe but the others don't apply until they believe? In other words, people are already forgiven because of the cross whether they believe it or not, but the rest of the benefits of the cross don't apply UNTIL they believe???? That is a real contradiction.

Hebrews 10:10 says, " By this will we have been sanctified (made holy) through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. What does this verse teach?

1. WE have been sanctified (made holy).
2. How were we made holy? "Through the offering of the body of Jesus"
3. So those for whom Jesus offered His body as a sacrifice were made holy.
4. For whom did He offer Himself? "Once for all."

So not only is everybody for whom Jesus offered Himself forgiven, but they have also been set apart (made holy) by Him.

Yes, there are verses that SEEM to suggest something to the contrary. I listed the verses that seem to suggest that we can lose our salvation to illustrate that it's possible to lift out verses that prove almost any position. I acknowledge that I could be doing that very thing in presenting my case about the holiness of humanity but I don't think that's what I'm doing. Rising above the limited vision that my tradition has allowed and taking a panoramic look at the Scripture causes me to believe that the cross is good news - already completed good news - for everybody. As I've often said, it's not a potential gospel we proclaim. It is finished. Done. Complete. The only thing left to do now is tell everybody what Jesus has done for them so they can believe it and live out of the wonderful joy of Reality.

Thanks, Terry, for your input. This lengthy response isn't directed solely to you but to others too. I know many would raise the point you implied by citing those verses so I thought this would be a good time to address that aspect of the matter.

20 comments:

  1. There just SEEM to be so many of these caveats, ( I'm talking about the word IF ) that for truth seekers like myself,developing a new mindset creates as many logjams as it does freedoms. Perhaps the word UNHOLY as found in 1 Tim.1:9 has a different meaning than the opposite of the word HOLY as found in Hebrews 10:10 ? Sorry, not a hermenuetic expert.When all mankind became HOLY because of the finished work of the cross, and if we are to conclude this by looking at the entire counsel of God's word, then all these verses that Terry 'cherry picked' become minor contexual problems ( not contradictions ) Truth has a way of appearing murky until verses that SEEM to say otherwise are tackled, especially if there are a lot of them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Do you believe in 'Universalism'? All will find out they have been redeemed, or if a person dies without knowing this or don't believe it what happens to them at their judgement?
    I have learned alot from your posts and teaching but am a bit confused on this aspect because many places in your teachings it sounds like all will or are saved......which I don't have a problem with.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No, P.A.T.C.- I am not a Universalist. I understand why some would question that because of my belief that all were included in the cross. My view is in line with the school of thought called "Trinitarianism." Sometimes people wrongly call it "Trinitarian Universalism" because they don't understand it. One difference between a Trinitarian viewpoint and a Universalist viewpoint is the one you've mentioned. Univr.contend that one day everybody will express faith in Christ and be saved. Trinitarians would love for that to be true but don't see the evidence in Scripture to warrant the certainty that Universalists have for that view. (For those of you who are Universalists, it's not necessary for you to send me all the verses that seem to suggest it will happen. I've read the best books in print on the subject and read all the verses Universalists cite. Still not convinced :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:54 AM

    Hi Steve
    Thanks for your answer to some difficult scriptures
    We dehumanize our wonderful humanity with our own thought, purpose and actions in unbelief a subjective response, which is not a holy act, while the Father by the Spirit in Jesus has humanized all of us in holiness, and objective reality, so that we may truly come to know and be known in this world; who we are, and of what wonderful recreated holy humanity we truly are in Jesus. It is not about our unholy compost but His holy composition. Let’s dance!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Robert - the verses cited in his post show why we need to look at verses one by one to see what they mean. There's not a 'one answer fits all" for the texts that seem to contradict the truth of the reality that God has chosen all of us to be included in His Life. I agree that there seem to be many caveats in Scripture, but if they mean what many suggest they mean at first glance, this whole "grace thing" isn't so great after all. Of course, we know that's not the case. As I've said in other posts, we need the unconditional love of God to be our starting point in understanding biblical truth. Thanks for your input. You make a good point.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Steve
    please explain then since it is not by any effort from our part or by any co opertaion/
    Jesus said those who believe & are baptised shall be saved..Ypu said earlier that those who made use of the free maoney bag handed out at Calvary (by Faith ) shall be saved, but if one does not believe & therefore never appropriates himself of this free treasure bag- shall not
    I am a bit confused - your many explanations seem right but is there a place where one might review all the biblical verses that at surface seem to contrdict this with explanations?

    Thanks

    Jb

    ReplyDelete
  7. Perhaps to further justify what you're saying Steve, when God says in His Word, the Bible, "I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life," I believe in Revelation, that this can be inferred that every man since Christ has there name in it (God's Book of Life,) at birth but when they decide not to be saved neither obey the Holy Spirit to accept Christ nor to endure confirming it for themselves they are Holy in fact like in Acts with Cornelius (a Gentile called Holy by Peter and the Holy Spirit...") and all are Holy and we treat them so just some won't go to Heaven when they are decease. They jump out of the Father's hand if they got there so to speak by the time they cease breath. Great thoughts Steve in the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  8. you keep including the resurrection in with the cross; why?
    why should they not be seen as two distinct works?

    imagine the resurrection had occurred 3 years later instead of 3 days later...would you still be using "the cross" to refer to both happenings? i doubt it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No, Lance. They are inseparable. The Apostle Paul defined the gospel this way in 1 Cor 15:3-4: " For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Joeborgx -to say, "he that believes and is baptized shall be saved" is like saying "he that gets on the airplane and sits down will fly to Phoenix." It's getting on the plane that gets you there, not sitting down. But you do need to sit down after you get on the plane.

    I have not compiled a list of verses that seem to contradict what I'm teaching. I encourage people to study the verses that trouble them and they will discover, one by one, that the Bible does not teach anything that contradicts the love and grace of God.

    ReplyDelete
  11. so are you determined to use "the cross" as shorthand for "the gospel"?

    i separate out each portion of the gospel:
    "the cross" deals with sin and crucifies our old man.
    "the burial" seals the death of the old man and death to sin.
    "the resurrection" provides new life.
    ...these three things, together, make up "the gospel".

    i find it confusing to use "the cross" as shorthand for "the gospel". there will come a time when you only want to focus on dealing with sin and you may want to refer to that as "the cross" as well. thus, you would use the same phrase in two different ways...which is confusing.

    for instance, if i referred to "the resurrection" as shorthand for "the gospel", i suspect everyone would be thoroughly confused about what i meant. similar if i referred to "the burial" as shorthand...

    ReplyDelete
  12. I don't think most people are confused by the phrase, Lance. Paul called it "the preaching of the cross" and was referring to the whole gospel. If you put a microscope on it, yes, there are distinctives between the components of the gospel but you're the first person I've encountered who has dissected it that way. I agree there are differences between them but to use the word "the cross" as "shorthand" for the gospel is acceptable, even biblically. If I teach on something that necessitates the distinction be made, I'll make it and then people won't be confused.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous8:51 AM

    Hi Steve
    Here a quote in the latest blog by Martin Davis “God for Us: who is talking about a quote from T F Torrance. I believe it adds to the discussion.

    “Rather than place our faith in the Bible itself, while attempting to defend it in terms of scientific accuracy and historical factuality, Torrance free us to look beyond the word of scripture to the divine reality toward which they point and whose presence is communicated to us by the Holy Spirit through the medium of scripture. Moreover, Torrance unburdens us from the attempt to micromanage the text of scripture, again with the understanding that the individual words of scripture are of secondary importance to the reality that underlies them. As Torrance might argue, the individual words of the text are not “the truth”, Jesus is “The Truth”. Rather than a repository of propositional truths to be considered apart for Jesus Christ, scripture is a divinely provided medium through which the Holy Spirit transforms our mind and brings us into a vital relationship with” The Truth” in the incarnate Word of God”.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Steve, I know you said you're not a universalist, but I've also heard you say you no longer have an Augustine view of hell. so what is your take on hell?
    Also what is salvation in your view? I ask because we have traditionally been taught it is going to heaven when you die (instead of hell), and yet the scriptures are not really clear on that.

    This is taken from Jath van der Westhuizen's blog - what do you think of this defn of salvation:

    "Salvation
    Salvation is a broad term. The meaning of the word is always determined by the context of Scripture. In Eph. 1 for instance, it refers to the redemptive act of God. In the Gospels, however, it often refers to Jesus’ healing miracles. “Go, your faith has made you whole.” The word “salvation,” means, healing, prosperity, peace, protection, deliverance, wholeness, save and safe. Its OT equivalent is, “shalom.”Salvation is also related to the soul of the human. By believing, your soul will be saved. The soul is referring to your mind, your being, your personality. The Greek word for soul is psuchÄ“, meaning “the seat of the feelings, desires, affections, aversions (our heart, soul etc.)" Strongs 5590

    ReplyDelete
  15. Go Penguin (what is your name?)- I will be speaking about hell on my Sunday Preaching broadcast in a few weeks. Right now, the topic online is about God's love. Next week, it's about justice. Then wrath. Then the next week, hell. So stay tuned ... :)

    The word "save"(sozo)means "to be rescued from danger and be kept safe." The context of the word affects its use because it can, as you've noted, be used to refer to deliverance from sin, sickness, dangerous situations, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks Steve my name is Grace.
    I'm wondering why the church always refers to being saved as going to heaven when you die.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thanks, Grace :) I think it's because they have a very limited view of what "salvation" is.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thank you Steve I appreciate you as a brother in Christ. It is interesting that you have posted on this subject at this time. I am a Trinitarian in my theology. I wasn't until the past couple of years. We are saved by the obedience of Christ. Salvation is complete in the person of Christ, but there must be a response of faith through the working of the Holy Spirit in order to share in the life of God. So ultimately we are justified by and live from the faith of Jesus Christ. We share in His obedience and live from His righteousness. Is that what you hold to substantially? If not all is well...Just curious...Grace and peace, Chris

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yes, Chris. That is my view. The only thing I might add is to say that by the working of the Holy Spirit we "subjectively" share in the life of God, because it is an objective reality, whether we personally know it or not. Jesus, as our Federal Head, included us all in His work. His obedience, His death & resurrection, His righteousness, etc. "I no longer live but the life which I now live in the flesh, I live by the faith OF the Son of God..." (Gal.2:20 KJV)

    ReplyDelete